About Me

Name: TiamoInfidels
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

PRAY FOR GALID SHALIT

Montey Python the Life of Brian

Scene 9

 


The commandos


FRANCIS:
We're gettin' in through the underground heating system here, up through into the main audience chamber here, and Pilate's wife's bedroom is here. Having grabbed his wife, we inform Pilate that she is in our custody and forthwith issue our demands. Any questions?
COMMANDO XERXES:
What exactly are the demands?
REG:
We're giving Pilate two days to dismantle the entire apparatus of the Roman Imperialist State, and if he doesn't agree immediately, we execute her.
MATTHIAS:
Cut her head off?
FRANCIS:
Cut all her bits off. Send 'em back on the hour every hour. Show them we're not to be trifled with.
REG:
And of course, we point out that they bear full responsibility when we chop her up, and that we shall not submit to blackmail!
COMMANDOS:
No blackmail!
 
____________________________________________________________
How very sad to see the reality of what they wrote when you read from this (and they wonder why we can't take them seriously):
____________________________________________________________
 
Jerusalem Post
 

Mashaal: Cease-fire is a 'tactic'


Hamas is still waiting for an official response from Israel to the group's readiness to declare a six-month truce, Hamas leaders said Saturday.

Damascus-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal.
Photo: AP [file] , AP

They said the Egyptian authorities, which have been mediating between Israel and Hamas, have yet to come back with an official response to the truce initiative.

In an interview on pan-Arab Al-Jazeera television Mashaal said that Hamas was ready to cooperate but added that "it is a tactic in conducting the struggle. ... It is normal for any resistance that operates in its people's interest ... to sometimes escalate, other times retreat a bit. ... The battle is to be run this way and Hamas is known for that."

He also warned of an explosion of violence in Gaza if Israel rejected the truce.

"Hamas has asked the Egyptians for a document containing Israel's commitment to abide by the truce," Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal told reporters in Qatar. "On the basis of this document, Hamas will decide whether to continue with the truce or reject it."

Mashaal said the truce was Egypt's idea and that Hamas would agree to it only if Israel complied with certain conditions. "Hamas did not initiate the period of calm," he said. "It came from the Egyptians."

Captured IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Schalit.
Photo: Courtesy

According to Mashaal, the cease-fire proposal was presented after Israel's attempt to invade Gaza failed.

He said that "Hamas will accept the Egyptian offer of a period of calm as a strong move and not a weak one."

Hamas is also hoping that Egypt would persuade Israel to reopen the Rafah border crossing if Israel fails to accept the truce initiative.

Mashaal warned that failure to reopen the borders would lead to an "explosion" in the Gaza Strip. "Our people will explode in the face of all those responsible for the siege," he said. "We have shown that we can surprise when we want."

Asked if the threat was also directed against Egypt, Mashaal said the Palestinians had no intention to target the Egyptians. He also said that Hamas would not agree to a unilateral cease-fire with Israel, stressing that any truce should be mutual."

"Hamas has accepted the Egyptian initiative," a Hamas official in the Gaza Strip said over the weekend. "Now the Egyptians have no excuse to continue the closure of the border crossing. They must go and talk to the Israelis about this issue."

He said Hamas representatives who visited Cairo last week received assurances from the Egyptians that the border crossing would be reopened once Hamas accepted the truce initiative.

"We are waiting for the Egyptians who are waiting for a response from the Israelis on this matter," he added. "As far as Hamas is concerned, there is no reason why the Rafah border crossing should remain closed."

Taher a-Nunu, spokesman for the Hamas government in the Gaza Strip, said he and his colleagues presented the Egyptians with evidence showing that some Palestinian Authority leaders have been playing a role in keeping the blockade on the Gaza Strip.

"We showed them written documents proving that these officials were responsible for the continued siege against our people," he said. "We demanded that the Egyptians reopen the borders regardless of what the Palestinian Authority says ."

The Egyptians have summoned representatives of other Palestinian factions to Cairo this week for consultations on the latest truce initiative. Among those invited are Islamic Jihad, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said the Egyptians were hoping to convince all the Palestinian factions in the Gaza Strip to join Hamas in accepting the truce with Israel. He added that in the absence of an official response from Israel, Hamas would continue to carry out "resistance attacks."

Also speaking on other topics, Mashaal referred to the possibility of Israel withdrawing from the Golan Heights in return for peace with Syria, and commented that this would affect Damascus-based Hamas leadership.

However, he believes that Israel's proposal to withdraw from the Golan Heights "is not serious, and surveys that indicate that most Israelis are against withdrawal prove this."

He added that "the matter of [kidnapped IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad] Schalit has been postponed due to political considerations. There is nothing new on the matter as a result of Israeli stubbornness."

Mashaal hinted that the Palestinian Authority is hindering the matter, stating that "we have concluded that there are factors in the area that are not interested in the matter so that Israel will not free Hamas ministers [prisoners held in Israel], and so as not to affect negotiations between Israel and Abu Mazen [Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas]."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THIS IS THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT

  Totally pillfered from Daily Sun
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/35580/St-George-s-parade-scrapped-in-case-it-upsets-Muslims/


ST. GEORGE'S PARADE SCRAPED...

IN CASE IT UPSETS MUSLIMS

By Steve Huges

A March to celebrate St George’s Day has been axed – because the authorities fear it could spark race riots.

About 1,500 children were due to take part in a parade to commemorate the patron saint of England on Wednesday.

But council bosses in Bradford, West Yorks, have ditched the event over concerns it could upset the Asian community, many of them Muslim.

They feared a repeat of riots that hit the city in 2001, when an Asian man was stabbed by National Front supporters and 300 police were injured. Officials suggested making the route shorter to avoid areas where the riots took place.

But the Rev Tony Tooby, chairman of governors at St Philips Primary School, said: “We wanted the route to include where the riots took place to educate our young people.

“But the police and council proposed another route which was ridiculously short.

“The march would have been over before it began.

“Unfortunately, there’s a fear someone may have used it to cause violence.

“The day seems to have been taken off us because of fear of thugs.” Tory MP Philip Davies, 36, added: “This was a prime opportunity to promote integration in a celebration of being British.

“The police and council – whether it’s through political correctness or whatever – have failed miserably. Frankly, it’s pathetic.”

About 10,000 people were expected to line the streets.

But council leader Kris Hopkins, 44, said: “The council has not banned the St George’s Day parade.

“Given the involvement of 1,500 children, including six and seven-year-olds, we suggested a slightly safer route.

“We have got a responsibility to look after our children.”

Ladbrokes have cut the odds of St George’s Day being made a Bank Holiday after a flurry of bets by patriotic punters.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BEST REASON TO VOTE FOR MCCAIN

 

Because Obama or Clinton are to young!

Follow my logic here for a moment ….

Carter = Worst. Ex-President. Ever.

Obama/Clinton = To Young, To Inexperienced plus their ages leave plenty of time after they leave office to ruin the lives of free peoples everywhere and vie for worst ex-president, which most people would like to see end with Jimmy.

McCain = Older. Wiser………....nuff said.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ONLY ONE WAY FOR CARTER TO SAVE HIS HONOR

I thought of one way Jimmy Carter could save his honor and perhaps not go down as the worst thing to happen to the free world since 1976.....
 
He could walk out with the living GALID SHALIT. 
 
Do it Jimmy ... JUST DO IT!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

REUTERS ARE DICKS

And for reporting this Reuters should be kicked, and hard.

 This study shows one thing. People can get paid for being stupid. 

"In a study, researchers found that binging, fasting, diet pill use and other eating disorder symptoms clustered within counties, particularly among female students.

"These findings confirm the strong social influences on female adolescents in the U.S. to be thin, sometimes using unhealthy behaviors to achieve this goal," the researchers write in the current issue of the International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Research in the 1980s in female college students first suggested that disordered eating behavior spread through "social contagion," demonstrating that binge eating clustered within sororities, Dr. Valerie L. Forman-Hoffman and Cassie L. Cunningham of the VA Iowa City Health Care System note in their report."

Really?   Social Contagion?   It’s freaking called PEER PRESSURE Dipshites.

We have known about peer pressure a long time. It is nothing new. Jeezus H. when will we stop giving money out to idots for their lazy ideas?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA RUNS AWAY AND CRY'S LIKE THE SCHOOL GIRL HE TRULY IS

Obama simply isn’t that good off the cuff. That is why he doesn’t believe the Democrats need another debate.   He can read a speech perfectly however, when he is on his own to answer some hardball (my arse) questions, he merely stumbles over his words and never sounds very convincing. 

The Nutroots must love this guy. He will fulfill their deepest desires, RUNNING!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SHAME ON AYERS? HECK NO, THAT WAS 40 YEARS AGO!

Concerning Ayers and his detestable habit of planting bombs, Obama says this: 

That was "40 years ago, when I was 8 years old," Obama said with exasperation.
 
Would someone please ask Mr. Obama at the next debate just how long someone should be publicly shunned for such activities as setting bombs and killing people for political statements?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA OCCASIONALLY EXCHANGES IDEAS WITH WEATHER UNDERGROUND

Barack Obama quote from Democrat Debate on April 16, 2008
"This is a guy (Ayers) who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He's not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis."
 
Does that means he OCCASIONALLY exchanges ideas with american terrorist Ayers, who is responsible for supporting terror tactics as a means to an end of political debates of which he can win no other way?

Bill Ayers who in a 2001 interview (ironically published the morning of September 11th) with the New York Times about his memoir said ''I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.'' 
 
And, please let us NOT forget where those bombs were set, in AMERICA!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SINGLE HANDEDLY BRINGING SHAME BACK TO AMERICA

It has always been a good rule of thumb for me to question things. Never take anything at face value, always hold the truth to be proven through empirical evidence. 

Well, that goes for people who “feel” to much. You know the types, they know this or they know that and they know it because they feel it. 

What kills me is how few of these feeling types ever question their feelings. As in, okay I am feeling good about this... why?   Or I am feeling anxious about that… why?   Or how about the big one, someone else questions their feelings and they will assuredly come out with some statement that vilifies you for the outrage. How dare you question their feelings! Everyone has a right to their feelings… all feelings are “right” there are no wrong “feelings”.

Okay, I agree. There are no “wrong” feelings. There are however inappropriate feelings for all sorts of situations and all sorts of feelings that are guided by thoughts that are outside of what most people would say are reality. 
I question why something makes me feel some way all the time.  It actually is a good habit.  People do actually benefit from asking themselves why they feel a certain way when someone says or does something. 

So, how can you ask someone if what they are feeling is what they should be (yes I said it! The evil word should!), or could be feeling if they just put some thought behind that feeling.

I am under the allusion that feelings are a guide. They are there to trigger other things like thoughts… feelings are not supposed to be used alone and without any judgments. They don’t work as well if you fester in them good, bad or indifferent.

There is an entire list of words that over the last 20 years have been practically erased from the American dialogue because of the way they make people feel. 

Shame

Guilt

Should

Could

Would

I am on a quest to bring these words back. They are good and useful words and if truth be told, some of the feelings that they force on people, OUGHT to be felt by those who would ban them. 

Let’s not reinvent the wheel. Some things NEED discussed, in calm, rational manners, so that we can say, this certain thing is not shameful but that certain thing is. And we all know what that is!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

INSPIRATIONAL

Barbara Sofer Barbara Sofer

By Barbara Sofer

 

The Human Spirit: Not in heaven


 
 
 
 
Police Supt. Sharon Landau Brown makes me want to sit down and write a novel. Imagine a comely and graceful religious woman ensconced in the main headquarters of national police headquarters in Jerusalem. On three sides, she's surrounded by machines: half-a-dozen computers, a microscope and a video spectral comparator, which lets her examine documents with ultraviolet, visible and infrared light. The fourth wall holds an alchemist's stock of chemicals.

Ilan Ramon z"l.
Photo: NASA

With these tools, London-born Brown - who holds two degrees in chemistry from the Hebrew University - has exposed contracts altered by unscrupulous landlords, passports stolen for human trafficking and identity cards used by terrorists. Brown is the nemesis of Israel's underworld.

But the documents I've come to hear about come not from the underbelly of life in the Middle East but from above. Literally out of the sky.

FIVE YEARS ago this week, the remains of Ilan Ramon's crew notebook were discovered in a field in Texas. Sharon Brown was charged with the mission of deciphering the pages.

On January 16, 2003, the space shuttle Columbia was launched into space carrying seven crew members, including Israel's star fighter pilot Ramon. On February 1, the Columbia burst apart 15 minutes before its scheduled landing. Heat-detecting weather radar equipment reported a bright red cloud of debris, scattered mostly over Texas.

On February 12, Ramon was buried at Moshav Nahalal in the Jezreel Valley, close to the Ramat David air base, where he served. Far away, in East Texas, thousands of searchers continued to look for parts of the spacecraft. Some 82,500 pieces of smoldering wreckage had fallen to earth. The searchers walked in long lines, an arm's breadth apart, through farmland, forest, bush and swamp. On April 4, two months and three days after the disaster, a Native American tracker came upon a small pile of papers in an open field.

Ilan Ramon. What exactly he wanted to say t o all of us about leaving Egypt will remain forever indecipherable.

Could these ordinary white loose-leaf papers with writing in pencil and black ink have traveled all the way from space? Some of the writing was visible, but it was in a language unfamiliar to the Indian tracker.

The writing was Hebrew. Twenty pages of Ilan Ramon's crew notebook.

The Columbia was traveling at nine kilometers a second when it disintegrated. The aluminum vaporized. The iron boiled. Only one diary was found: Ramon's. When Rona Ramon, Ilan's widow, brought in the bag with the remains to the Israel Police, Brown was astonished.

"I was thinking the remains would be burned, charred and blackened, but I saw that some of the writing was legible." She requested a standard astronaut's notebook from NASA to see what a new one looked like. "It was a paper notebook in a cardboard binding; its survival is incredible," says Brown, shaking her head. "I have no explanation for it."

Brown unstuck and opened the curled paper. She unfolded and sorted, piecing together the puzzle. She found a sample of Ramon's distinctive handwriting in an IDF booklet that helped her to compare his handwriting with the fragments in her hands. Brown noticed that he sometimes wrote the Hebrew letter lamed to look like the digit seven. When she'd completed the jigsaw, she passed completed pages to Michael Maggen, a paper expert at the Israel Museum, for proper conservation.

Some of the pages seemed totally "washed out," but using the video spectral comparator with which she debunked forged documents, she was able to recover the writing on six pages. At Rona's request, personal material would remain private, but the fighter pilot-turned-astronaut's sensitive descriptions of life in space could go on to posterity.

The rest of the surviving pages were too dim and indistinct to read.

BROWN CAME up with a new idea. She turned to veteran police photographer Lazer Sin-David to use the computer touch-up program Photoshop on the remaining pages. He scanned and processed the pages using the "burn" and "dodge" functions, and presto! Like magic, faint blurs turned into letters. Here was a long legible list of topics for the public affairs officer - Ramon's comments about the beauty of seeing Earth with no lines marking the borders between countries. He noted his intent to increase scientific research for the betterment of life on Earth. He wanted to say something about employment for the needy, about the Declaration of Independence, a facsimile of which was aboard ship. He wanted to remember to talk about the Torah scroll that had survived the Holocaust and Moon Landscape by Petr Ginz, who had not.

Brown figured out the next page from a few scant phrases. Written out was the entire kiddush recited on wine, the Hebrew complete with punctuation so he would get the pronunciation right.
"I was a total puddle of tears when I saw that," said Brown. "What a man. He took to heart how he represented all of us."

Together, Rona and Ilan had designed his pilot's patch. One of its emblazoned symbols was the Columba, the dove, often associated with the dove of Noah's Ark. The constellation Columba was the source of the shuttle's name Columbia, and it's also the name of Brown's beloved late mother, who escaped from Trieste on the last boat out.

"Ilan Ramon saw his mission as the first Israeli astronaut as a mark of the Jewish people moving from the dark of the Holocaust to the light," she said. "And I feel privileged that I could decipher his writing."

One page remained a conundrum. Brown could make out three Hebrew words: Bnei Yisrael, the biblical reference to the people of Israel, and hayam, "the sea." The rest were just vague marks on the page.

SUDDENLY, A thought struck her. A Torah-observant Jew, she checked her calendar and looked up the week's reading for the space launch. Sure enough, it corresponded to words of the chapter, which talked about the splitting of the Red Sea as the Children of Israel left Egypt. Ilan Ramon had prepared a dvar Torah, a message from the Torah, from space.

The Torah portion he'd wanted to mention was B'shalah. It tells the story of our exodus from Egypt and the deliverance through the splitting of the sea - singing with faith and hope.
"I imagine Ilan Ramon going up to God and saying he had something to still tell the Jewish people," said Brown. "I picture those papers fluttering down from heaven with a message for all of us."

What exactly Ilan Ramon wanted to say to all of us about leaving Egypt will remain forever indecipherable. As the Brown family will do next week, when Sharon and her husband Ian sit around the extended family table for their Pessah Seder, they will pass on the story of the ultimate Jewish voyage out of Egypt to their four daughters. Like all of us, they will search for the message behind the words of the Haggada.

They'll be eating at the home of one of Supt. Brown's sisters. She's an explosives expert. But that's a different story.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PERES: CARTER DAMAGED PEACE PROCESS

READ IT JUST FOR THIS QUOTE:
"I've been meeting with Hamas leaders for years," Carter said.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1207650000340&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
 

Former US president Jimmy Carter was immediately criticized upon his arrival in Israel Sunday by President Shimon Peres, who told him that his plans to meet with exiled Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal were a "severe mistake."

Peres - who, like Carter, is a Nobel Peace Prize laureate - said Mashaal was an extremist and an illegitimate leader who had given orders to kill Israelis. Far from swaying Mashaal to change his ways, a conversation between the two men would harm the chances for peace, he said.

Carter met on Sunday night with the parents of kidnapped IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Schalit. In a closed-door conversation over tea in the King David Hotel, where the ex-president is staying, Noam Schalit asked Carter to help advance a deal to free his son, who has been held by Hamas for 33 months, when Carter meets with Mashaal later this week in Syria.

"We spoke. We asked him to use his influence to help us," Schalit told The Jerusalem Post after the meeting.

On Monday, Carter is slated to visit both Sderot and Barzilai Medical Center in Ashkelon.

But neither choice endeared him to the Israeli public. Carter, who brokered the 1979 peace deal with Egypt, was off to a chilly start, both because of the impending meeting with Mashaal and his 2006 book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, which compared Israeli actions in the West Bank with the racial oppression that once reigned in South Africa.

So the aging diplomat in a gray suit, who slipped quietly into the lobby of the King David Hotel on Sunday evening, did not draw the attention of top Israeli politicians.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Defense Minister Ehud Barak have all declined to meet with him, citing "scheduling problems." Likud chairman Binyamin Netanyahu did not want to meet with the ex-president, either.

"There is no doubt that Jimmy Carter as a former president should be greeted as a matter of protocol, but it does not mean that the prime minister, the foreign minister and certainly the opposition leader have to meet him," Netanyahu adviser Uzi Arad told Israel Radio.

Foreign Ministry officials, meanwhile, told the Post that Carter's visit placed Israel in a no-win situation, adding that the story of his visit here was sparking some interest in the US press, which was following to see what kind of reception he would receive.

On the one hand, the officials said, a complete snub of the ex-president would not look good in the US, where Carter still enjoyed some clout and public stature by virtue of his former position. On the other hand, meetings with Israeli officials could be used by Carter to bash the Israel lobby in the US.

He was likely to use these meetings to cast the Israel lobby in Washington as hysterical, one diplomatic official said, portraying his Jewish critics in the US as trying to outdo Israel in their criticism of him, since Israeli officials were willing to meet with him.

Carter's upcoming talks with Mashaal has met with criticism in the US as well, including among State Department officials and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Such a meeting would be the first in two years between Hamas and a prominent American figure.

But before heading off to Israel, Carter, in an interview with the ABC News program This Week, said he felt "quite at ease" about meeting Hamas members over the objections of Washington, because the Palestinian group was essential to a future peace with Israel.

"I think there's no doubt in anyone's mind that, if Israel is ever going to find peace with justice concerning the relationship with their next-door neighbors, the Palestinians, that Hamas will have to be included in the process," he said.

Although he said the meeting would not be a negotiation, he outlined distinct goals.

"I think that it's very important that at least someone meet with the Hamas leaders to express their views, to ascertain what flexibility they have, to try to induce them to stop all attacks against innocent civilians in Israel and to cooperate with the Fatah as a group that unites the Palestinians, maybe to get them to agree to a cease-fire - things of this kind," he said.

The State Department has said it advised Carter twice against meeting representatives of Hamas, which Washington considers a terrorist organization.

"I find it hard to understand what is going to be gained by having discussions with Hamas about peace when Hamas is, in fact, the impediment to peace," Rice said Friday, after reports of the planned meeting surfaced.

Carter said he had not heard the objections directly, although a State Department spokesman said earlier that a senior official from the department had called the former president.

"President Carter is a private citizen. We respect his views," Stephen Hadley, the US national security adviser, said Sunday on This Week.

"The position of the government is that Hamas is a terrorist organization, and we don't negotiate with terrorists. We think that's a very important principle to maintain," Hadley said. "The State Department made clear we think it's not useful for people to be running to Hamas at this point and having meetings."

Asked whether it was right to meet a group that had not renounced violence or recognized Israel, Carter said, "Well, you can't always get prerequisites adopted by other people before you even talk to them."

Pressure to drop the meeting has come from his own party. Democratic Reps. Artur Davis of Alabama, Shelley Berkley of Nevada, Adam Schiff of California and Adam Smith of Washington state wrote a letter to Carter, saying the meeting could confer legitimacy on a group that embraces violence.

"I've been meeting with Hamas leaders for years," Carter said.

Carter is among a growing group of critics who think that the policy of isolating Hamas has been counterproductive. Several months ago, a group of prominent former senior US officials - including Brent Scowcroft and Carter's own national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski - called for "genuine dialogue" with the Islamic group.

During his visit to the region, Carter also plans to meet with the presidents of Egypt and Syria, as well as the king of Saudi Arabia.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA HAS A PLAN! AND HE HAS SAID WHAT IT IS!

 

CAN YOU SPOT THE INSANITY?

Watching this yesterday I had to control myself from wanting the turn the bloody thing off.   I can barely stand the thought that my country may seriously be this ignorant.

Insanity:

“OBAMA: And so my final -- and I'll even pose this as a question and I won't -- you don't necessarily have to answer it -- maybe it's a rhetorical question -- if we were able to have the status quo in Iraq right now without U.S. troops, would that be a sufficient definition of success?

It's obviously not perfect. There's still violence, there's still some traces of Al Qaida, Iran has influence more than we would like. But if we had the current status quo, and yet our troops had been drawn down to 30,000, would we consider that a success? Would that meet our criteria or would that not be good enough and we'd have to devote even more resources to it?”

Sanity:

“CROCKER: Senator, I can't imagine the current status quo being sustainable with that kind of precipitous drawdown.”

Insanity:

“BIDEN: That wasn't the question.”

You decide:

Me: No Biden, you are correct. That was not the question. The question sounded more like this…

If I had a fur lined sink, and I accidently pooped in it, and I sent you the dry cleaning bill, would you pay for it?   WTF?

Insanity:

“OBAMA: No, no, that wasn't the question. I'm not suggesting that we yank all our troops out all the way. I'm trying to get to an endpoint. That's what all of us have been trying to get to.

And, see, the problem I have is if the definition of success is so high, no traces of Al Qaida and no possibility of reconstitution, a highly-effective Iraqi government, a Democratic multiethnic, multi- sectarian functioning democracy, no Iranian influence, at least not of the kind that we don't like, then that portends the possibility of us staying for 20 or 30 years.

If, on the other hand, our criteria is a messy, sloppy status quo but there's not, you know, huge outbreaks of violence, there's still corruption, but the country is struggling along, but it's not a threat to its neighbors and it's not an Al Qaida base, that seems to me an achievable goal within a measurable timeframe, and that, I think, is what everybody here on this committee has been trying to drive at, and we haven't been able to get as clear of an answer as we would like. “

Sanity:

“CROCKER: And that's because, Senator, is a -- I mean, I don't like to sound like a broken record, but this is hard and this is complicated. “

You decide:

Me: Exactly! 

IT. IS. COMPLICATED. GET. IT?

Why doesn’t Obama just tell us his vision for success?

LOWER. THE. BAR.

Do we really need to put up with THIS?   SHEESH!!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT DO I KNOW?



Well, I may not know much, but I do know this...  I have no idea who in the Middle East (besides Israel) can be trusted not to lie to our faces while plotting someone else’s destruction...  not necessarily Israel or even our own, but someone, even within their own population.
 
 
That is what religious sanctioned lying does.  It. Stops. Trust.

Okay, that said, many people are up in arms as to why we are letting Iran put in more centrifuges.  I have a few thoughts.

1)  I am not a trained military leader.  I am not trained in the evaluation of the timing for battles or the strategy behind them.  Neither are most of those spewing their own opinions but that doesn't stop most people.  I trust that our military over there is keeping an eagle eye on them and they have a plan.

2)    Syria is also doing much secretive WMD activity.  Israel helped us out tremendously by taking out the Syrian Nuke ability.  Did those WMD's come from Iraq?  Maybe, maybe not.  It is all speculative at this point.

      a)  If they did, than perhaps the Iran Nukes are a joke and meant to distract us from seeing what is happening in Syria.

      b)  if not, well they still pose a bit of a problem to us as well as Pakistan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and well the list goes on and on but you catch my drift. 

Either way, I think people should settle down and let the commanders decide the timing and strategy of these things.  It's big, let us please let the people trained in this do their jobs without second-guessing them at each and every freaking step!

Seriously, you see how well wars are fought when half the country thinks they know more than the military on the ground.  How freaking arrogant people are when they cannot even play chess or risk or thinking in three dimensions rather than one or two. 

So, long rant short... well okay, shorter, Israel has our backs people.  They are GOOD at what they do.  We have their backs and unbelievably we are GOOD at what we do. 

Keep knowledgeable of world events; keep your brain working as to what it all means, but DO NOT make up your mind before all the facts are in.  And all the facts never come in until years after the freaking thing is over! 

Basically, what I am saying is CHILL THE "F" OUT!  :)

PS. Don’t you just love a good run on sentence!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT DO I KNOW?

Well, I may not know much, but I do know this...  I have no idea who in the Middle East (besides Israel) can be trusted not to lie to our faces while plotting someone else’s destruction...  not necessarily Israel or even our own, but someone, even within their own population.

That is what religious sanctioned lying does.  It. Stops. Trust.

Okay, that said, many people are up in arms as to why we are letting Iran put in more centrifuges.  I have a few thoughts.

1)  I am not a trained military leader.  I am not trained in the evaluation of the timing for battles or the strategy behind them.  Neither are most of those spewing their own opinions but that doesn't stop most people.  I trust that our military over there is keeping an eagle eye on them and they have a plan.

2)    Syria is also doing much secretive WMD activity.  Israel helped us out tremendously by taking out the Syrian Nuke ability.  Did those WMD's come from Iraq?  Maybe, maybe not.  It is all speculative at this point.

      a)  If they did, than perhaps the Iran Nukes are a joke and meant to distract us from seeing what is happening in Syria.

      b)  if not, well they still pose a bit of a problem to us as well as Pakistan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and well the list goes on and on but you catch my drift. 

Either way, I think people should settle down and let the commanders decide the timing and strategy of these things.  It's big, let us please let the people trained in this do their jobs without second-guessing them at each and every freaking step!

Seriously, you see how well wars are fought when half the country thinks they know more than the military on the ground.  How freaking arrogant people are when they cannot even play chess or risk or thinking in three dimensions rather than one or two. 

So, long rant short... well okay, shorter, Israel has our backs people.  They are GOOD at what they do.  We have their backs and unbelievably we are GOOD at what we do. 

Keep knowledgeable of world events; keep your brain working as to what it all means, but DO NOT make up your mind before all the facts are in place.  And all the facts are never in place until years after the freaking thing is over! 

Basically, what I am saying is, CHILL THE FU@K OUT!  :)

PS. Don’t you just love a good run on sentence!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

COMPLETLY STOLEN FROM: http://www.powerlineblog.com/

A Lesson In Economics

Nancy Pelosi is one of a number of Democratic politicians who married rich men, thereby freeing themselves to meddle in your life and mine. Today, in her press conference on Iraq, she sympathized with the common man who has to worry about the cost of groceries:

More troubling economic news arrives nearly every day, consumer prices for staples, such as milk, bread and eggs, rose by the largest amount in 17 years.

That's true. But, while rising grocery prices are caused largely by government policies, they have nothing to do with the war in Iraq. Food prices are increasing mostly because of the massive subsidies that support the ethanol industry. All across the Midwest, ethanol plants have sprung up, each one consuming huge quantities of corn. Iowa is now, I believe, a net importer of corn. A large percentage of America's corn crop is being turned into ethanol rather than hamburgers, steaks, bacon, pork chops, eggs, milk, etc. Skyrocketing demand for corn has led to unprecedented prices.

It's called the law of supply and demand. Pelosi should ask her husband about it. I'm sure he could explain it to her.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »